Labelling Processes Essay

The labelling supposition is a micro interactionist approach, this is be arrange it focuses on how singles construct the affectionate world through face-face interactions. It recognises the c erstwhilept of the procedural egotism where ones identity is always constructed and recognised in interaction with evidentiary others, this results in the individuals demeanour, including that related to abomination and optical aberration.Significant others ar those who are in mellowed mixer power and thus able to dictate influence and actively determine an individuals life. Such individuals may include patrol officers, prison officers, politicians, parents and teachers. Feminists would present however that these are all the males in society, ascertain and controlling the lives of females, keeping society patriarchal. The influence that significant others place on individuals lives is through the use of labels, the labels arent usually based on individual characteristics, more so stereotypes, work assumptions and professional knowledge. For example Cicaurel found that police patrolled working class areas more intensively, resulting in more arrests, this is due to the polices stereotypical view that delinquent individuals are part of the working class.Lemert distinguishes between primary and secondary aberrance in society. Primary deviance involves minor offences such as vandalism or smoking minor and these acts are usually uncaught or insignificant. However an individual may be caught for such acts and inturn be labelled as delinquent or deviant, the social reaction of this label results in the development of secondary deviance more serious crimes such as assault or drugs. This therefore illustrates that it is non the act itself but the hostile societal reaction by significant others that creates serious deviance, thus crime and deviance being products of the labelling process. Support for this predilection is research conducted by Jock Young on hi ppy cannabis users. Drugs were associated with hippies which demonstrate primary deviance. Police then labelled and persecuted hippies for their behaviour, excluding them from normal society. AS a result a deviant subculture emerged where hippies retreated into closed groups, grew hair out long, wore eccentric clothes and drug use became a central activity.Gove argued that there are two consequences of labelling creation of sigma, modification of self images. Stigma is the negative branding of an individual and refers to the national condemnation and exclusion of the criminal. The media tend to exaggerate the behaviour of such people, causation increased fear and moral panic in society, resulting in dodge and constantly being treated with suspicion. Becker refers to a master status where once a person is labelled all of their actions are interpreted in light of the label and only negative aspects of that individuals behaviour are focussed on. Because of the stigma created from the label a modification of self image occurs in the individual. The individual essentially lives up to their deviant label, decorous the person described in the label.The process of deviancy amplification whereby any punishments or treatment therefore reinforce the individual perception of the criminal, thus more crimes fitting to the label are carried out. This theory can however by criticised because it is determinist, where individuals take up n control over the process and once they have been labelled they will inevitably turn deviant or criminal. complaisant action theorists believe in free will and individuals choice to reject their label. In addition the label may cause the opposite result where an individual seeks to actively prove their label incorrectly by thriving and succeeding in their work/ life.Furthermore the labelling theory claims that deviant and criminal behaviour only occurs when a label is given, it does not account for crimes committed by those who have n o labels placed upon them. Marxists, for example, would argue the theory fails to explain middle class, white collar or embodied crime, since the offenders have high social power and would be significant others preferably than the individuals labelled.In conclusion although the labelling theory offers some explanation as to the crime and deviance in todays society there are many gaps. Other explanation such as subcultural crime and deviance would argue that it is not the interaction of individuals but the illegitimate opportunity structures inwardly society that results in crime and deviance.