Compare and Contrast Two Works of Art

Anthony Arteaga Art History Ancient World Home educate concession 1 Compargon and contrast the crush, concept, and the Formal Element of the twain plant life of art. Also, explain which category this work falls in. The two valets I adjudge chosen poop be found on page 200, conception 6-51, employment of Centaurs and Wild Beasts from Hadrians Villa and on page 434, figure 14-8, difference of opinion of the lady and Serpent. Not only did I choose these partings for their beauty, just in addition because both works eat similar yet different subjects, concepts, and perfunctory elements. Both of these images have subject matter that is the same even though theyre different.The subjects for the Battle of Centaurs and Wild Beasts from Hadrians Villa argon animals centaurs ( male and womanish), tiger, lion, cheetah as well as a pelt and granitelike scenery. The subjects for Battle of the Bird and the Serpent atomic number 18 animals peacock, a serpent, and red cents in a n acorn manoeuver. Both segments be temper based animals that live in a world where pick of the fittest is reality. The important difference between theatrical role iodine and two is that in piece one centaurs ar mythological creatures and in piece two the animals ar not fictional.Both pieces have subjects that are the same however their concepts can be perceived as similar but different. Both pieces have themes that can be perceived as alike. The start-off image is a male centaur raising a boulder over his head to crush a tiger that has severely wounded a female centaur. The pelt roughly his arm suggests he returned from a hunting expedition to find his love one, either lover or sibling, critically wounded by trey otherwise beasts and his facial expression is that of concern, instead of rage or fury. The concepts in this battle scene are protection, rescue, vengeance, self-defense, and/or survival.I use the word survival because the three feline beasts are animals th at assume to eat as well. They need to eat like all animals and if thither is no prey, then in that location is no food to survive. The jiffy piece is a peacock guardianship a dead serpent in its beak. The concepts in this piece are battle, victory, triumph, and dominance, when one creature overcomes another. Our textbook says that this scene is an allegory for Christ (peacock) tricking and overcoming hellion (serpent). The peacock has an expression of being removed to the outcome of the battle. Even though both pieces are about battle and bloodshed there are differences in the concept.In the origin piece the male centaur is the favored winner of the fight, because of his size, discourteous weapon, and his element of surprise. But regardless the outcome, he al educate lost when the female centaur was killed. Whether he kills or is killed by the remaining felines, the female is gone and he cant bring her back. Unlike the uphold piece where there is an established winner and l oser. straight that Ive discussed the concepts of these two pieces, Id like to talk about their orchis elements. The formal elements are indisputable elements that are used to describe the subject or image.The elements are roll, texture, line, color, space, and values. The shapes in piece one can be found in the accent as geometric shapes. at that place is a triangular stone in one corner and a flat rectangular stone in the opposite corner. A cheetah is mounted on a cube, micturate to pounce. The boulder the centaur holds over his head is rectangular block. The scenery is mostly loaded shapes but the subjects have curves in their undersides and muscle tone. The shapes in the morsel piece can vary. In the peacocks wing, corpse, thigh, and tail you can see a closed tear- drop shape.There is a row of white circles on the birds neck and two rows of white circles on its wing. The tail has a leaf type that matches the leaves on the acorn tree. The serpent has a circular patter n on its belly and a scaly pattern on its backside. There are geometric shapes in both pieces however, the geometric shapes are in the main secluded to the primer in piece one and is inside the subjects body in piece two. In piece two, the shape in the peacocks tail and snakes body is organic. Also, the shapes in the priming coat are fuzzier and assumed in piece one where the shapes in piece two are sharper and more defined.Another formal element is texture. The frontmost piece, according to the text, is a floor mosaic which is imperturbable of many colored tesserae that were laid down in irregular, curving lines, which efficaciously imitated painted brushstrokes. The individual tiles are more apparent when viewed closely. This gives the piece a grainy and earthy texture, where it tangiblely looks bumpy. The textbook says it has foreshortening, the illusion created on a flat surface in which figures and objects place to recede or toil sharply into space.The second piece was drawn with tempera on parchment. This makes the piece look smooth, flat, and two dimensional. The next element is color. The hues in both pieces are relatively earth toned. Both pieces have a low aim of saturation. In piece one, the sky is mustard brown with a region of mint commons that frames the boulder that the male centaur is holding. The rocky scenery has browns and creams with a dull green and brown center. A bright green game of pine trees is in the corner that contrasts with the sky and rocks.The colors to the second piece are similar in the sense that it has low saturation. The colors are dull and warm. This piece utilizes reds and oranges, in the serpent, that the first piece does not. Because of the tan background, the green in the peacocks body emboldens the subject. The brown around its tail compliment the blue inside the tail. Lines are another element thats used. The lines in the first piece, which are made of many tiny lines and squares, are jagged and sharp. T he sky and earth are divided by a jagged rocky background and the same can be tell about the foreground.This creates a stage for the battle. There are jagged lines in the sky that frames the boulder being held. This piece has no physical lines that discontinue the body and background, which makes it look three dimensional. In the second piece, the acorn tree is a line (with branches) that adds to the images depth. There are lines inside the wing, beak, and talons. There is also a dividing line in both the serpent and in the body of the peacock. The physical lines in this piece separate the subjects and background making it look two dimensional and flat.Both pieces use lines to accentuate the subjects but the first piece has lines that are realistic and the second piece uses lines as borders for the subjects which makes it look more enliven and less real. The next element that artists will use is space. The first piece has a female centaur lying on the ground with a tiger sprawled over her back end. Male centaur is looming over tiger with the dead lion behind him, both their legs overlapping, which also creates a three dimensional effect. A cheetah is on a cube in the background ready to pounce. The jagged foreground creates an illusion of a cliffs edge.In the second piece, the acorn tree is decisive for establishing where the subject lies, giving it its depth. The serpent is hanging from the peacocks beak and coils beneath the bird. If the acorn tree was gone then the snake would appear to be free falling in empty space. Both pieces have uses depth, but the first piece appears to be more three dimensional where the second piece appears flat. The final element artists will use is value. The first piece has a dark to light value in the rocky scenery and in the shading in the animals, which also adds to its three dimensions.The second piece has a dark subject value and light background which contrasts each other. The body of the peacock has a darker green hue but is uniform there is no change in value in the subject. Both pieces have a dark to light value, but the first piece has variation of shades from one side of the piece to the other and within the subjects themselves. The second piece has dark subjects and a light background. Now that weve discussed the formal elements, the last topic is which category these two pieces are class as.Certain works of art can be classified as representational, abstraction, and non-objective. The first piece is representational with an abstract background. Because of its hues, shapes, and shading the subjects are portrayed as three dimensional and proportional. Even though a centaur is fictional, it still looks realistic. However, the backgrounds contours and colors are vague making it more abstract. The second piece is abstraction because of its flat appearance, its bold colors, and the shape of the subjects eyes, wings, and tail.The patterns in and around the tail and in the body also adds to its a bstraction. The tree in the foreground does not look natural and the birds on the branches are unrealistic. Ive compared and contrasted the subjects, concepts, and the Formal Elements of two works of art. Also, I explained which category this work falls in. The two pieces I chose is Battle of Centaurs and Wild Beasts from Hadrians Villa and Battle of the Bird and Serpent. Both of these pieces have subject matter that can be compared similarly even though theyre different.