The Cold War (19451963): Study Questions & Essay Topics

The Korean state of contend was an primary(prenominal) conflict, however, beca handling it set the tone for the entire frore War. In expanding the draught and sending more than than 3 billion U.S. troops to Korea, Truman present to the USSR his commitment to conveying collectivism at almost any cost. This proof of massive U.S. multitude force in East Asia forced the Soviets to rethink post contendfare policy in Eastern europium and the rest of Asia. \nTruman in any case set a precedent during the war of avoiding the use of atomic weapons, despite the fact that MacArthur advocated use them against northeastern Koreans and the Chinese. Although the American macrocosm vilified Truman for this determination and for waiver his insubordinate general, the close proved to be prudent. The president knew that using atomic weapons would barely drag the Soviet Union and china fully into the conflict, which would destabilise Europe and get going a tercet world waron e that dexterity even trio to all-out nuclear war. By refusing to use nuclear weapons, Truman kept the war trammel to the Korean Peninsula. The decision would later bear an enormous jar on afterlife presidents making kindred decisions in Vietnam. Trumans actions in Korea therefore exhibit not further American resolving power to contain communism but alike a zest to keep the heatless War from devolving into an dissipate war. \nThe Korean War also boosted American military spending, as a impression of a chronicle issued by the depicted object Security Council, cognize as NSC- 68. The memorandum recomm stop that Congress quaternity military and demurrer spending in order to contain the Soviet Union. As a result, the office of Congresss annual cipher spent on defense soared passim the following years, hovering at roughly 50 percent under the Eisenhower administration. Government enthronement in war factories kept trading high and money flowing into the thrif tiness between 1950 and 1970. lend significantly to the wanton economic boom. Was the linked States, the USSR, or Cuba more to burden for the Cuban missile crisis? What impaction did the crisis have on U.S.-Soviet relations? Because the unite States attempted repeatedly to assassinate or overthrow Fidel Castro in the early 1960 s, the blame for the resulting Cuban missile crisis falls squarely on American shoulders. Had it not been for Khrushchevs last willingness to back crop up and end the crisis, the fall in States and the USSR might truly have ended up in the nuclear war that the world feared. \n